By Alvin Tran
Rates of C-section deliveries vary widely across the nation, according to the findings of a new study.
The study, published Monday in the journal Health Affairs, found that the overall rates of C-sections — the most common type of surgery in the U.S. — varied from about 7 to 70 percent across the nation’s hospitals.
“We were really surprised by how much variation we saw,” said Dr. Katy Kozhimannil, an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota’s School of Public Health and the study’s lead author. Kozhimannil said she and her colleagues expected the rates of cesarean births among lower-risk mothers to vary less compared to the overall rates.
The research team analyzed 2009 data from more than 1,000 hospitals in 44 states, taking patient characteristics into account as well as hospitals’ size, teaching status and geographic location.
The study’s findings suggest that small and rural hospitals showed more variability in C-section rates compared to other hospitals. Teaching hospitals, however, showed less variation in overall C-section rates.
Despite concerns about overuse of cesarean deliveries, Kozhimannil cautioned that some of these surgeries will always be necessary and researchers should be careful to not make doctors too uncomfortable about performing a cesarean.
“When you see variation in something, it could suggest overuse or either underuse. I think it’s important to look out for underuse as well,” Kozhimannil added. “Cesarean deliveries save lives and every woman who needs a cesarean delivery should have one.”
Dr. William Grobman, a spokesman for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a professor in obstetrics and gynecology at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, said that it is important to “encourage deliveries that can be safely undertaken vaginally to occur and not to do unnecessary cesareans.”
In an interview, Grobman said the high number of cesarean deliveries has big consequences for health care costs and use and doctors consider different standards when weighing the procedure.
Though her study was unable to explain why the variation in cesarean deliveries exists, Kozhimannil is optimistic that future research — studies that analyze the financial and payment incentives in place for managing pregnancy care — may help answer the question.
“I think it is important to look beyond the woman and her characteristics and beyond the clinicians and their characteristics and really look at the system-level factors that are driving these variability and patterns in care,” she said.
The study makes four key recommendations, including better coordination among providers of maternity care to help reduce the need for C-sections and better data collection on the procedure.
The researchers also called for Medicaid, which funds nearly half of all U.S. births, to use its clout to help improve hospital obstetric practices.
And they suggested that new policies be implemented to empwer patients to help make decisions on their deliveries and to make data on the procedure more widely available.
“I think the fact that pregnant women cannot look up unbiased, easily available information on cesarean delivery rates in the hospitals from which they’re choosing is a problem that should be rectified,” Kozhimannil said.
This article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.